Skip to main content
KeenSafe
Offensive · Adversarial Simulation

Adversarial simulation — threat-actor-aligned playbooks

Reproduce the techniques and procedures of named threat actors against your environment to validate prevention, detection and response across realistic kill chains.

Offensive Security·Continuous adversarial validation
LiveContinuous Validation · Pipeline
LANE 01T1078T1190T1110T1003T1550T1486T1071LANE 02T1078T1190T1110T1003T1550T1486T1071GAPLANE 03T1078T1190T1110T1003T1550T1486T1071SIMULATION COVERAGE · ATT&CKReconInitial AccessPersistenceExfilCOVERAGE73%
The problem

Where teams get stuck

Generic BAS frameworks run a fixed library of techniques. Real adversaries chain TTPs across stages, adapt to defences and operate within the noise floor of normal IT activity. Defence assumptions need to be tested against that, not against atomic checklists.

The KeenSafe approach

How we engage

Each simulation is a curated playbook — TTPs sequenced into realistic kill chains, executed with production-aware controls, and evaluated against the prevention, detection and response that your environment actually has today.

Methodology

Four-step engagement model

Same rigour every engagement, calibrated to your environment, threat model and regulatory exposure.

STEP 01

Threat intelligence input

Select adversary playbooks relevant to your sector, geography and crown jewels.

STEP 02

Production-safe execution

Sequenced TTPs run with throttling, isolation and rollback — across endpoint, identity, cloud and network.

STEP 03

Detection scoring

Per-TTP assessment of blocked / alerted / missed across SIEM, EDR, identity, network controls.

STEP 04

Continuous regression

Run again whenever controls or environment change — drift in detection becomes immediately visible.

What you get

Deliverables

Every engagement ships these outputs — reproducible, evidence-backed and ready for executives, engineers and auditors.

Adversary-aligned playbooks

TTP chains sourced from real threat-actor reporting, mapped to ATT&CK.

Control coverage matrix

Per-tactic, per-technique view of where prevention, detection and response stand.

Detection-as-code uplift

Concrete detection-engineering tasks with example queries and acceptance criteria.

Continuous validation

Re-run the same playbook automatically after every control change or environment shift.

Scope of engagement

What this engagement covers

Concrete coverage. Clear boundaries. Optional add-on tracks where customers want to extend.

Included
  • Curated adversary playbook library (APT, FIN, ransomware affiliate, hacktivist)
  • Sequenced TTP execution under production-safe controls
  • Per-TTP detection scoring across endpoint, identity, network, cloud
  • BYO CTI feed integration (Recorded Future, Mandiant, Anomali, custom)
  • Detection-engineering backlog with example queries + acceptance criteria
  • Continuous regression — playbooks re-run after every control change
Optional add-ons
  • Sector-specific playbooks (financial / healthcare / energy / telecoms)
  • Custom threat-actor playbook built from your CTI inputs
  • Cross-stack coverage extension (additional SIEM / EDR products)
  • Quarterly playbook refresh based on evolving adversary tradecraft
Out of scope
  • Goal-driven human-led red team (covered by Managed Red Teaming)
  • Initial control deployment (covered by Architecture & Hardening)
Engagement model

How we deliver

Duration
6–10 weeks initial · then continuous regression
Team
CTI analyst + detection engineer + offensive operator
Format
Remote with secure connector · onsite for sensitive scope
Who it is for
  • SOC + detection-engineering teams
  • Threat-led testing programmes
  • NIS2 / DORA-regulated entities
  • Detection-mature enterprises
Sample report

What lands on your desk

Sections customers actually see in the engagement deliverable.

  1. 01
    Coverage matrix

    Per-tactic, per-technique view of where prevention, detection and response stand across your stack.

  2. 02
    Detection-as-code backlog

    Concrete detection-engineering tasks ready to land in your SIEM next sprint.

  3. 03
    Drift report

    Per cycle: coverage delta since last run; controls that improved, controls that regressed.

  4. 04
    Adversary alignment report

    Which threat actors your current posture would catch, which would walk through.

MITRE ATT&CK

Techniques covered

T1059
Command and Scripting Interpreter
T1055
Process Injection
T1486
Data Encrypted for Impact
T1071
Application Layer Protocol
Compliance mapping

Frameworks & regulations

NIST CSF DE/RSISO 27001 A.12MITRE ATT&CKDORA TLPT
Common questions

Frequently asked

Is this BAS or red teaming?
It is the disciplined middle ground — sequenced adversary playbooks, production-safe, re-runnable. Red teaming is goal-driven and human-led; this is TTP-coverage driven and continuously verifiable.
Can I bring my own threat-intel feeds?
Yes. Curated KeenSafe playbooks plus your CTI sources, mapped onto a single ATT&CK coverage view.
How safe is this in production?
Every TTP is production-aware: throttled, scope-bounded, with explicit rollback. We start in monitor-only and ramp up only after telemetry confirms safety.
Get Started

Work with the team behind KeenSafe

Continuous adversarial validation, managed security operations and executive-grade risk visibility — delivered by senior offensive security engineers.